Related topics

Free Hosting Mp3 Site
riki see_my_home@page microsoft public pocketpc developer godfatherofs...@yahoo.com wrote: We're looking for a way around this new signing event business Am I correct in expecting the trust prompt to display when users first run our installer? yes, it prompts when you first load an unsigned executable file,

Bug#247427: ITP: elfsign -- ELF binary signing and verification ...
I never sign my app and windows never complains about them. Try my apps if you will: http://finn.mobilixnet.dk/programuk.htm Hmm, interesting. The situation I'm experiencing this in, is for an application that's actually being run over the newtwork (the executable is on a (SAMBA/Linux) shared drive on a server).

ActiveX Hijinks, was Re: Summary of OS Wars (My Opinion)
Signing executable content is a VERY good addition to security. It is, however, not security. Someone said that insisting on perfect security was for those who didn't have the balls to live in the real world. I'm really safe with my computer disconnected from the net - and I'm really safe staying in bed.

Package signing tools
Issues: In testing, I noticed that the subversion/tests/cmdline/svnserveautocheck.sh script does not have the executable bit set. This is true both in the release tarballs, as well as in the repository. I'm still +1 to release, but we should probably fix this before the next 1.4.x release. Nice catch.

Signing pasive content, png images
Java's security is definitely *not* "security through obscurity" in that sense; the security architecture, the security manager, the signing infrastructure, I'm hearing that running Java via a JDK 1.0 browser is like running a native executable - the only difference is security through obscurity?

Digitally signed Perl executable not working.
I'm signing all DLL's, EXE's and CAB's with the either the SDKFailsafeEmulator.pfx or SDKSamplePrivDeveloper.pfx. I use CabWiz to generate the CAB and EZSetup.exe to package all the components into a self-extracting executable, ABC.EXE (also signed) for deployment from desktop running Windows XP/ActiveSync 4.1: 1.

Code signing certificates - probably worth the money
If you are in fact talking about "code signing" being aa standard PB feature, I still don't understand how is this possible. How can a tool that does not have Windows Vista certification produce an executable that can masquarade as Windows Vista certified one. Not even talking about the fact that this executable is

OT: Digital signing
Quoted from the article: "Digital signatures and certificates of authenticity can be applied to executable programs, ActiveX controls, or Office Visual Basic It's the industry standard for encrypting and digitally signing information. I have used it for several years now and am very pleased with the results.

Volunteers to test some kernel code...
@param data Data to sign - * @param passcode Passcode to sign it with - * @return Signature + * @param awsSecretKey passcode to sign it with + * @param .... (original) +++ trunk/java/com/xerox/amazonws/ec2/Jec2.java Wed Feb 27 17:55:44 2008 @@ -254,8 +254,6 @@ /** * Describe the AMIs executable by supplied users.

Windows SP2 application signing
Finally, I have used a Verisign certificate that was supplied as two files, an executable and a private key. To sign a VBA project, in the VBA editor go to Tools > Digital Signature. If you have more than one certificate installed, use the Choose button to select the right one. Then click OK. Not too bad, eh?

Signing an executable from code?
I'd like to provide a code signing utility. Aside from SignTool, can anyone point me to the API level support for this. I'm looking through the Platform SDK What is the value of a "code signed" PowerBuilder generated executable if PowerBuilder itself (the tool that is used to produce the executable) will NOT be

Code Signing Powerbuilder Executables
./apps/openssl dgst -sha1 -sign keyrsa.pem -out dsignrsa.bin CHANGES It causes a segfault with backtrace This sequence of commands doesn't cause a We have a extra test suite testing openssl executable. Unfortunately, it's GNU make specific. Are you interested in it? Are you interested in this test suite?

signing code
If so, as I said, this is no different than protecting a user from running a trojan compiled file - people either trust the author (and hopefully use code signing), or run the code in a sandbox. In terms of ensuring that only admin's can install the ruby executable/interpreter - this is currently impossible,

How can I call an executable file ?
Nu willen we een certificaat aan een executable toevoegen. Nu hebben we wel een site gevonden waar dit beschreven staat hoe dit moet http://www.pantaray.com/signcode.html. Maar ze gaan hier alleen maar een test certificaat installeren en wij willen een certificaat gebruiken die is uitgegeven door onze eigen CA.

US-NY: New York-Art Director
(compare fingerprints on the signing key, and that the signature checked OK). PGP relies on a web of trust between users. PGP corporation has published the How do I know that PGP corp has not introduced a back door into that big 8 MB executable? This is a different question from the first--you don't know that

Key Pair export; Order for signing and encrypting messages ...
In that way code signing isn'ta replacement for things such as the Certified for Windows program, but a necessary complement. If you run across an executable that is allegedly Certified for Windows, that won't guarantee anything unless the executable is *also* code signed, *and* you are able to find the executable

signing code
I'd have it actually run the pkg_check executable so we don't mix the crypto code into the pkg_add executable, for those who build FreeBSD without the crypto support. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC w...@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to

The oldest and youngest executable prisoners-US treaty violations
[0] Clauses like this crap: You may embed this Package's interpreter within an executable of yours (by linking); this shall be construed as a mere form of aggregation, provided that the complete Standard Version of the interpreter is so embedded. We *need* that clause, but this "interpreter" stuff doesn't make any

Script signing
Digitally sign your applet. Try the Code Signing for Java Applets FAQ: <http://www.suitable.com/Doc_CodeSigning.shtml> and the Sun Java Security FAQ: <http://java.sun.com/sfaq> Finally the Java Programmers FAQ has a large section on security: <http://www.afu.com/javafaq.html> davep -- Dave Postill Investment

Win32 DLL Signing
Sean Wilson webforumsu...@macromedia.com macromedia director basics You could try signing the projector skeleton prior to publishing your executable - I don't know if it will work, but it's worth a try. Find the file named "projec32.skl" in the root Director folder and sign that (you may need to rename it to .exe